Readicide is a perfect noun. It is a word that so accurately mirrors the damage that schools can do towards the pleasures of reading. I would hazard to guess that most students do not realize that many people actually read for the pleasure of reading. I would also guess that the students who do read for pleasure--or entertainment--rarely commit themselves to the highest pleasures that can come with reading, such as insight, knowledge, novelty, aesthetic appreciation, the expansion of the consciousness--and so on. To put pleasure in one sphere and knowledge in the other does a horrible disservice. In fact, I would say that the only reason to read is for please, and that the greatest pleasure in reading (or in all art) is aesthetic appreciation and insight.
For example, here is film director Mike Leigh on art and entertainment:
People say, "Ah, yes, but audiences just want to escape." I think, that if people see a film like "Secrets and Lies," where the stuff that's going on relates to things that they really care about, then it's more of an escape. Because you become so engaged in it and enthralled by it that you forget those things. They answer "Well, yes, but then the audience worries about real life things," but it's fulfilling, it's enriching, it's not like just eating candy for an hour and three quarters. It's actually really communing with something and feeling like you've been through something that comes out making you feel better able to go back and worry about the specific things that are your problems. So I think people are very dumb about escapism and entertainment and all that. They say, "Ah yes, but we're in the entertainment business." Excuse me; I am in the entertainment business and I make no bones about it. If my movie ever was not entertaining, it's a turkey as far as I'm concerned. My aim is to entertain, meaning, literally, what the word means. People forget what that word means. It means to make you stay here, to keep you in your seat. One of the things that drives me mad about watching films in this country is that nobody can sit still for two minutes -- everyone's in and out like bloody monkeys in a cage and eating and talking. The attention span is dreadful because -- and I submit that this did not happen in the Golden Age of Hollywood when they made movies that made you sit there and really watch the whole time -- it's boring, basically.
When I was in grade school the teacher told the class that there were very specific reasons to read: pleasure and learning. By doing this, my grade school teacher created two separate spheres that many (if not all) of the students took as a fact: entertainment is what we do in our spare time; learning is what we do in school. This is unfortunate, of course, because it created a false dichotomy between learning and entertainment.
I guess if I have an issue with Readicide it is that it may give too much power to the students. Reading mediocre books just because the students like them is bound for failure. Not all reading is equal. Reading The Game of Thrones or Hunger Hames is not equal to reading Of Mice and Men or The Great Gatsby. The latter books are better in every way. If students are really going to fall in love with reading--as well as get all they can out of reading--then they need to read literature and grow an appreciation for the best stories available. The hardest job as a teacher is encouraging students to develop this love and passion for the literature as well as an appreciation for the finest art.
Or maybe not. Maybe that's pretentious and unrealistic--but I'm sticking to it anyway!